[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1423743557-12090-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:19:17 +0800
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <ananth@...ibm.com>,
<anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <luto@...capital.net>,
<keescook@...omium.org>, <oleg@...hat.com>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
<dave.long@...aro.org>, <tixy@...aro.org>, <nico@...aro.org>,
<yalin.wang2010@...il.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
<anton@...ba.org>, <stefani@...bold.net>, <JBeulich@...e.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <prarit@...hat.com>, <fabf@...net.be>,
<hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 02/26] kprobes: makes kprobes/enabled works correctly for optimized kprobes.
debugfs/kprobes/enabled doesn't work correctly on optimized kprobes.
Masami Hiramatsu has a test report on x86_64 platform:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/19/274
This patch forces it to unoptimize kprobe if kprobes_all_disarmed
is set. It also checks the flag in unregistering path for skipping
unneeded disarming process when kprobes globally disarmed.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index c397900..c90e417 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -869,7 +869,8 @@ static void __disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, bool reopt)
{
struct kprobe *_p;
- unoptimize_kprobe(p, false); /* Try to unoptimize */
+ /* Try to unoptimize */
+ unoptimize_kprobe(p, kprobes_all_disarmed);
if (!kprobe_queued(p)) {
arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
@@ -1571,7 +1572,13 @@ static struct kprobe *__disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
/* Try to disarm and disable this/parent probe */
if (p == orig_p || aggr_kprobe_disabled(orig_p)) {
- disarm_kprobe(orig_p, true);
+ /*
+ * If kprobes_all_disarmed is set, orig_p
+ * should have already been disarmed, so
+ * skip unneed disarming process.
+ */
+ if (!kprobes_all_disarmed)
+ disarm_kprobe(orig_p, true);
orig_p->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
}
}
--
1.8.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists