[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1423743571-12180-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:19:31 +0800
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <ananth@...ibm.com>,
<anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <luto@...capital.net>,
<keescook@...omium.org>, <oleg@...hat.com>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
<dave.long@...aro.org>, <tixy@...aro.org>, <nico@...aro.org>,
<yalin.wang2010@...il.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
<anton@...ba.org>, <stefani@...bold.net>, <JBeulich@...e.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <prarit@...hat.com>, <fabf@...net.be>,
<hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 04/26] ftrace: don't update record flags if code modification fail.
X86 and common ftrace_replace_code() behave differently.
In x86, rec->flags get updated only when (almost) all works are done. In
common code, rec->flags is updated before code modification, and never
get restored when code modification fails.
This patch ensures rec->flags kept its original value if
ftrace_replace_code() fail. A later patch will correct that function
for x86.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 45e5cb1..6c6cbb1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -2254,23 +2254,30 @@ __ftrace_replace_code(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, int enable)
/* This needs to be done before we call ftrace_update_record */
ftrace_old_addr = ftrace_get_addr_curr(rec);
- ret = ftrace_update_record(rec, enable);
+ ret = ftrace_test_record(rec, enable);
switch (ret) {
case FTRACE_UPDATE_IGNORE:
return 0;
case FTRACE_UPDATE_MAKE_CALL:
- return ftrace_make_call(rec, ftrace_addr);
+ ret = ftrace_make_call(rec, ftrace_addr);
+ break;
case FTRACE_UPDATE_MAKE_NOP:
- return ftrace_make_nop(NULL, rec, ftrace_old_addr);
+ ret = ftrace_make_nop(NULL, rec, ftrace_old_addr);
+ break;
case FTRACE_UPDATE_MODIFY_CALL:
- return ftrace_modify_call(rec, ftrace_old_addr, ftrace_addr);
+ ret = ftrace_modify_call(rec, ftrace_old_addr, ftrace_addr);
+ break;
}
- return -1; /* unknow ftrace bug */
+ if (ret)
+ return -1; /* unknow ftrace bug */
+
+ ftrace_update_record(rec, enable);
+ return 0;
}
void __weak ftrace_replace_code(int enable)
--
1.8.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists