[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150212135056.GA10646@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:50:56 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, waiman.long@...com, davej@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, jeremy@...p.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, riel@...hat.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
a.ryabinin@...sung.com, sasha.levin@...cle.com, dave@...olabs.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing
completions
On 02/12, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>
> @@ -191,8 +189,7 @@ static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> * We need to check "unlocked" in a loop, tmp.head == head
> * can be false positive because of overflow.
> */
> - if (tmp.head == (tmp.tail & ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG) ||
> - tmp.head != head)
> + if (__tickets_equal(tmp.head, tmp.tail) || tmp.head != head)
> break;
Ah, it seems that "tmp.head != head" should be turned into
!__tickets_equal(), no?
Suppose that TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG is set after the first ACCESS_ONCE(head),
then tmp.head != head will be true before the first unlock we are waiting
for.
And perhaps you can turn these ACCESS_ONCE into READ_ONCE as well.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists