[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150212145942.GE4665@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:59:42 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Junjie Mao <eternal.n08@...il.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, boot: Allow 64bit EFI kernel to be loaded above 4G
On Wed, 11 Feb, at 11:29:58AM, Peter Jones wrote:
>
> From grub's point of view I'm not sure why we'd care - the pages kernel
> and initramfs land in are both from the Boot Services allocator, so if the
> machine doesn't support high addresses, they won't be there.
It's not that some implementations don't "support" higher addresses,
it's that the EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL is buggy and it corrupts the memory when
reading into it; you can allocate it just fine. At least, that's what I
remember from the limited investigation I performed.
But since grub doesn't use EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL, we should be cool.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists