linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/14] ARM: dts: Introduce STM32F429 MCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1423828078.4182.17.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:47:58 +0100
From:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <Nikolay.Borisov@....com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] ARM: dts: Introduce STM32F429 MCU

Hi Maxime,

Am Donnerstag, den 12.02.2015, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Maxime Coquelin:
[...]
> +	soc {
> +		reset_ahb1: reset@...23810 {
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> +			reg = <0x40023810 0x4>;
> +		};
> +
> +		reset_ahb2: reset@...23814 {
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> +			reg = <0x40023814 0x4>;
> +		};
> +
> +		reset_ahb3: reset@...23818 {
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> +			reg = <0x40023818 0x4>;
> +		};
> +
> +		reset_apb1: reset@...23820 {
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> +			reg = <0x40023820 0x4>;
> +		};
> +
> +		reset_apb2: reset@...23824 {
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			compatible = "st,stm32-reset";
> +			reg = <0x40023824 0x4>;
> +		};

These are mostly consecutive, single registers. I wonder if these are
part of the same IP block and thus should be grouped together into the
same reset controller node?

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/