linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] perf list: avoid confusion of perf output and the next command prompt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:52:44 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangnan0@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] perf list: avoid confusion of perf output and the
 next command prompt

Em Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:11:53PM +0800, Yunlong Song escreveu:
> Distinguish the output of 'perf list --list-opts' or 'perf --list-cmds'
> with the next command prompt, which also happens in other cases (e.g.
> record, report ...).
> 
> Example
> Before this patch:
> $perf list --list-opts
> --raw-dump $          <-- the output and the next command prompt are at
>                           the same line
> 
> After this patch:
> $perf list --list-opts
> --raw-dump
> $                     <-- the new line

Unsure about this one, IIRC this --list-opts thing was added to be used
together with shell autocompletion, have you checked that this extra
newline is OK with that?

Please try searching for the changeset that introduced --list-opts to
get info about how to test this,

Thanks,

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/