[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54DE192B.5060402@xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:32:59 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
CC: Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, hch@....de, tonyb@...ernetics.com,
axboe@...com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
lauraa@...eaurora.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
webbnh@...com, hare@...e.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] media/videobuf2-dma-sg: Fix handling of sg_table
structure
On 02/13/2015 04:20 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Hello Hans
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
>> Hi Ricardo, Marek,
>>
>> I have a few questions, mostly to improve my own understanding.
>>
>> First of all, is this solving an actual bug for you, or did you just find
>> it while reviewing code? And if it solves a bug, then which architecture
>> are you using? ARM? Intel?
>>
>
> My arch is intel based (AMD APU). I found it while doing review. While
> updating our kernel to 3.19 I had to patch some of my out of tree
> drivers, and then I gave a look to the file.
>
>>> dma_map_sg returns the number of areas mapped by the hardware,
>>> which could be different than the areas given as an input.
>>> The output must be saved to nent.
>>>
>>> The output of dma_map, should be used to transverse the scatter list.
>>>
>>> dma_unmap_sg needs the value passed to dma_map_sg (nents_orig).
>>
>> I noticed that few dma_unmap_sg calls actually use orig_nents. It makes
>> me wonder if the dma_unmap_sg documentation is actually correct. It does
>> clearly state that orig_nents should be used, and it might well be that
>> the only reason this hasn't led to problems is that very few architectures
>> actually seem to return nents < orig_nents.
Actually, I think I should pay more attention how often I actually write
'actually'. I went a bit too far with that... :-)
>
> It is not the most clear API to use :(. Some of the prototypes do not
> make a lot of sense, and it is documented outside the code.
>
> I have sent these two patches:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/11/231
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/11/232
>
>>> + sgt->nents = dma_map_sg_attrs(buf->dev, sgt->sgl, sgt->orig_nents,
>>> + buf->dma_dir, &attrs);
>>
>> Is a driver free to change sgt->nents? It's unclear from the documentation
>> or code that that is actually the purpose of sgt->nents. Most drivers seem
>> to store the result of dma_map_sg into a driver-specific struct.
>
> As I understand it, this is the purpose of the struct scatter list,
> have at hand the three values that you need,
> the sgl, nents and orig_ents.
>
> But it would be great if the maintaner of the dma-api speaks up :)
Yes please. And if Ricardo is correct, then someone (janitor job?) should do
a review of dma_unmap_sg in particular.
Regards,
Hans
>
> I am putting get_maintainer.pl in cc
>
> Thanks Hans!
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists