linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 2/3] firmware: dmi_scan: fix dmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150213161244.GB30567@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:12:44 +0000
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To:	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:	Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/3] firmware: dmi_scan: fix dmi_len type

On Wed, 11 Feb, at 06:12:59PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> 
> Good point. Actually, I don't really see the need for patch #1, even
> if I agree that it would have been better to write it like you have in
> the first place.
> But leaving the dmi_len as u16 is clearly a bug on my part, so that
> should be fixed.
> 
> @Matt: any thoughts?

Ivan, I'd prefer it if you move PATCH 1 to be PATCH 3, i.e. make the
urgent changes at the beginning of the series and the cleanups at the
end. That nicely sidesteps the issue of having to backport a cleanup
patch as a dependency for a real bug fix.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/