linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 linux-trace 1/8] tracing: attach eBPF programs to tracepoints and syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMEtUuzP9RBaaWr7d1qkFB_fukK44hALvFyxY=x95TKqw8q-Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:54:18 -0500
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 linux-trace 1/8] tracing: attach eBPF programs to
 tracepoints and syscalls

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:33:05 -0800
> Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
>
>
>> fair enough.
>> Something like TRACE_MARKER(arg1, arg2) that prints
>> it was hit without accessing the args would be enough.
>> Without any args it is indeed a 'fast kprobe' only.
>> Debug info would still be needed to access
>> function arguments.
>> On x64 function entry point and x64 abi make it easy
>> to access args, but i386 or kprobe in the middle
>> lose visibility when debug info is not available.
>> TRACE_MARKER (with few key args that function
>> is operating on) is enough to achieve roughly the same
>> as kprobe without debug info.
>
> Actually, what about a TRACE_EVENT_DEBUG(), that has a few args and
> possibly a full trace event layout.
>
> The difference would be that the trace events do not show up unless you
> have "trace_debug" on the command line. This should prevent
> applications from depending on them.
>
> I could even do the nasty dmesg output like I do with trace_printk()s,
> that would definitely keep a production kernel from adding it by
> default.
>
> When trace_debug is not there, the trace points could still be accessed
> but perhaps only via bpf, or act like a simple trace marker.

I think that is a great idea!
Makes it clear that all prints are for debugging and
no abi guarantees.

> Note, if you need ids, I rather have them in another directory than
> tracefs. Make a eventfs perhaps that holds these. I rather keep tracefs
> simple.

indeed. makes sense. no reason to burn fs memory just
to get an id from name. may be perf_event api can be
extended to lookup id from name. I think perf will benefit as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/