linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] pci: spear: Use platform_driver_probe instead of platform_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJs94EbeyuZjpMWo2UnYgEVLnj-o2NZu-e_B2bo7bepqxo67Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:16:12 +0400
From:	"Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey@....msu.ru>
To:	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mohit KUMAR <mohit.kumar@...com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] pci: spear: Use platform_driver_probe instead of platform_driver_register

2015-02-13 5:08 GMT+03:00 Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/12/2015 11:07 AM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>> 2015-02-11 12:19 GMT+03:00 Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>:
>>> please don't top posting.
>>>
>>> On 02/11/2015 10:38 AM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:HI
>>>
>>>> It sounds reasonable, but does current implementation support deferring?
>>>
>>>thor
>>> yes, it uses deferred probe see devm_phy_get() and devm_clk_get() calls in
>>> .probe and how the returned values are checked.
>>>
>>>> Struct  spear13xx_pcie_driver just dissapears from memory after init.
>>>
>>>
>>> IMO this is expected because spear13xx_pcie_driver is annotated as
>>> __initdata.
>>
>> The question was how deferred probe had been expected to work? When
>> probe has been deferred at first attempt, then second attempt
>> performed after init section, so proble() function must be available,at
>> but it is not. Isn't it?
>>
>
> That is questionable, maybe it works by chance?.

Or maybe it doesn't work at all.


-- 
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov.
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/