| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1423987029.5538.16.camel@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 15:57:09 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@...org>
Subject: [LKP] [SUNRPC] c4a7ca77494: +6.0%
fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches, no primary result change
FYI, we noticed the below changes on
commit c4a7ca774949960064dac11b326908f28407e8c3 ("SUNRPC: Allow waiting on memory allocation")
testbox/testcase/testparams: nhm4/fsmark/performance-1x-32t-1HDD-f2fs-nfsv4-8K-400M-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd
127b21b89f9d8ba0 c4a7ca774949960064dac11b32
---------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
52524 ± 0% +6.0% 55672 ± 0% fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches
436 ± 14% +54.9% 676 ± 20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[0]:/.tg_load_contrib
433 ± 15% +54.7% 670 ± 21% sched_debug.cfs_rq[0]:/.blocked_load_avg
8348 ± 7% +27.0% 10602 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[0]:/.min_vruntime
190081 ± 13% +32.7% 252269 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_goidle
205783 ± 12% +30.2% 267903 ± 13% sched_debug.cpu#0.ttwu_local
464065 ± 11% +26.6% 587524 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#0.nr_switches
464278 ± 11% +26.6% 587734 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_count
15807 ± 11% +19.6% 18910 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#4.nr_load_updates
300041 ± 8% +20.3% 360969 ± 10% sched_debug.cpu#0.ttwu_count
1863 ± 9% +18.1% 2201 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.exec_clock
testbox/testcase/testparams: nhm4/fsmark/performance-1x-32t-1HDD-btrfs-nfsv4-8K-400M-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd
127b21b89f9d8ba0 c4a7ca774949960064dac11b32
---------------- --------------------------
fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
| | |
52184 ± 0% +5.6% 55122 ± 0% fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches
557 ± 19% +21.5% 677 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[5]:/.blocked_load_avg
217 ± 19% -42.9% 124 ± 21% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.load
45852 ± 14% -39.4% 27773 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu#7.ttwu_local
457 ± 18% +50.1% 686 ± 20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[0]:/.tg_load_contrib
455 ± 18% +46.7% 668 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[0]:/.blocked_load_avg
66605 ± 10% -26.7% 48826 ± 14% sched_debug.cpu#7.sched_goidle
78249 ± 9% -22.5% 60678 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#7.ttwu_count
153506 ± 9% -22.7% 118649 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#7.nr_switches
153613 ± 9% -22.7% 118755 ± 12% sched_debug.cpu#7.sched_count
15806 ± 6% +19.2% 18833 ± 18% sched_debug.cpu#4.nr_load_updates
2171 ± 5% +15.6% 2510 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.exec_clock
9924 ± 11% -27.0% 7244 ± 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.min_vruntime
3156 ± 4% -13.4% 2734 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.min_vruntime
testbox/testcase/testparams: nhm4/fsmark/performance-1x-32t-1HDD-ext4-nfsv4-9B-400M-fsyncBeforeClose-16d-256fpd
127b21b89f9d8ba0 c4a7ca774949960064dac11b32
---------------- --------------------------
104802 ± 0% +7.7% 112883 ± 0% fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches
471755 ± 0% -1.3% 465592 ± 0% fsmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
1977 ± 36% +90.8% 3771 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu#4.curr->pid
2 ± 34% +80.0% 4 ± 24% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[1]
4 ± 33% +83.3% 8 ± 31% sched_debug.cpu#6.cpu_load[0]
193 ± 17% +48.0% 286 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.blocked_load_avg
196 ± 17% +47.5% 290 ± 19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[2]:/.tg_load_contrib
96 ± 18% +40.6% 135 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.load
97 ± 18% +38.5% 135 ± 11% sched_debug.cpu#7.load
2274 ± 7% -16.5% 1898 ± 3% proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma
319 ± 6% -29.7% 224 ± 24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[1]:/.tg_load_contrib
314 ± 5% -29.4% 222 ± 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq[1]:/.blocked_load_avg
621 ± 10% +41.9% 881 ± 37% sched_debug.cfs_rq[4]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
nhm4: Nehalem
Memory: 4G
fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches
114000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+
113000 O+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
| O O O O O
112000 ++ |
111000 ++ |
| |
110000 ++ |
109000 ++ |
108000 ++ |
| |
107000 ++ |
106000 ++ |
| |
105000 *+.*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*..*...*..*..*..*..*..*..*..* |
104000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
To reproduce:
apt-get install ruby
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/setup-local job.yaml # the job file attached in this email
bin/run-local job.yaml
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Fengguang
View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (2005 bytes)
View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (754 bytes)
_______________________________________________
LKP mailing list
LKP@...ux.intel.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists