[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E1D3F6.3040500@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:26:46 +0800
From: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 linux-trace 1/8] tracing: attach eBPF programs to tracepoints
and syscalls
Hi, Alexei
Another suggestion on bpf syscall interface. Currently, BPF +
syscalls/kprobes depends on CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. In kernel used on
commercial products, CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is probably disabled, in this
case, bpf bytecode cannot be loaded to the kernel.
If we turn the functionality of BPF_SYSCALL into a loadable module, then
we can use it without any dependencies on the kernel. What about change
bpf syscall to a /dev node or /sys file which can be exported by a
kernel module?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists