[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E17F18.8070809@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 05:24:40 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, patches@...aro.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Fix v2-only build regression
On 16/02/15 11:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2015 11:36:03 Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> Currently if nfsd is configured as v2 only then the kernel fails to build.
>> This is a regression introduced by 9cf514ccfacb("nfsd: implement pNFS
>> operations"). It occurs because inline code from the xdr4.h header is
>> now included from generic nfsd code (via pnfs.h).
>>
>> This patch takes the simplest route and makes conditional the problematic
>> inline function.
>>
>> Note: I also tried extending the #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_PNFS to cover almost
>> all of the pnfs.h header file. That works great too but feels more
>> invasive. However I can dust this off if that were preferable for
>> any reason.
>>
>
> I believe this was fixed last Friday in the patch below. Do you still
> see the problem on today's linux-next?
Thanks Arnd. I overlooked this patch (which didn't pop out very clearly
in the google searches I did).
It is fixed in linux-next.
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists