[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E21CB2.1090108@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:37:06 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/35] tick/xen: Provide and use tick_resume_local()
On 16/02/15 12:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Xen calls on every cpu into tick_resume() which is just
> wrong. tick_resume() is for the syscore global suspend/resume
> invocation. What XEN really wants is a per cpu local resume function,
> but yes, its simpler to just use something which works by chance and
> let those who want to change that code deal with the fallout.
>
> Provide a tick_resume_local() function and use it in XEN.
Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists