linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: always program GPMCFCLKDIVIDER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150216171030.GS2531@atomide.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:10:31 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Robert ABEL <rabel@...-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc:	khilman@...prootsystems.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM OMAP2+ GPMC: always program GPMCFCLKDIVIDER

* Robert ABEL <rabel@...-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> [150216 07:52]:
> GPMC uses GPMCFCLKDIVIDER during synchronous as well as asynchronous accesses
> in conjunction with WAITMONITORINGTIME. Thus, it's wrong to only program it for
> synchronous accesses. Remove the conditional.

Do you have some test case that gets fixed by this? Or does this
fix some regression?

The reason why I'm asking is that AFAIK we've had async access
working all along?

Reagrds,

Tony


 
> Signed-off-by: Robert ABEL <rabel@...-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> index 5c3639c..bae4a20 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
> @@ -382,19 +382,14 @@ int gpmc_cs_set_timings(int cs, const struct gpmc_timings *t)
>  	if (gpmc_capability & GPMC_HAS_WR_ACCESS)
>  		GPMC_SET_ONE(GPMC_CS_CONFIG6, 24, 28, wr_access);
>  
> -	/* caller is expected to have initialized CONFIG1 to cover
> -	 * at least sync vs async
> -	 */
>  	l = gpmc_cs_read_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1);
> -	if (l & (GPMC_CONFIG1_READTYPE_SYNC | GPMC_CONFIG1_WRITETYPE_SYNC)) {
>  #ifdef DEBUG
> -		printk(KERN_INFO "GPMC CS%d CLK period is %lu ns (div %d)\n",
> -				cs, (div * gpmc_get_fclk_period()) / 1000, div);
> +	printk(KERN_INFO "GPMC CS%d CLK period is %lu ns (div %d)\n",
> +	       cs, (div * gpmc_get_fclk_period()) / 1000, div);
>  #endif
> -		l &= ~0x03;
> -		l |= (div - 1);
> -		gpmc_cs_write_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1, l);
> -	}
> +	l &= ~0x03;
> +	l |= (div - 1);
> +	gpmc_cs_write_reg(cs, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1, l);
>  
>  	gpmc_cs_bool_timings(cs, &t->bool_timings);
>  
> -- 
> 2.3.0
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/