[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <54E24517.6040108@partner.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:29:27 +0300
From: Stefan Strogin <s.strogin@...tner.samsung.com>
To: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <d.safonov@...tner.samsung.com>,
Pintu Kumar <pintu.k@...sung.com>,
Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>,
Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Dyasly Sergey <s.dyasly@...sung.com>,
Vyacheslav Tyrtov <v.tyrtov@...sung.com>,
gregory.0xf0@...il.com, sasha.levin@...cle.com, pavel@....cz,
stefan.strogin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm: cma: add some debug information for CMA
Hello Gioh,
Thank you for your answer.
On 14/02/15 10:40, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>
>> If this tracer is justifiable, I think that making it conditional is
>> better than just enabling always on CONFIG_CMA_DEBUGFS. Some users
>> don't want to this feature although they enable CONFIG_CMA_DEBUGFS.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your work. It must be helpful to me.
>
> What about add another option to activate stack-trace?
> In my platform I know all devices using cma area, so I usually don't
> need stack-trace.
>
So Joonsoo suggests to add an option for buffer list, and you suggest to
add another in addition to the first one (and also add CONFIG_STACKTRACE
to dependences) right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists