[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E24806.5030605@emulex.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:41:58 -0500
From: James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi/lpfc: use remove handler as shutdown handler
Looks good.
Acked-By: James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>
-- james
On 1/26/2015 10:18 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Without a shutdown handler, some cards behave very badly after a kexec.
> During probe, pending DMA writes will corrupt kernel memory, for
> example.
>
> Using the remove handler guarantees we will use a well tested path.
>
> With this patch I applied, I managed to use kexec multiple times and
> probe and SCSI scan worked every time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> index 0b2c53a..8aa804a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> @@ -11248,6 +11248,7 @@ static struct pci_driver lpfc_driver = {
> .id_table = lpfc_id_table,
> .probe = lpfc_pci_probe_one,
> .remove = lpfc_pci_remove_one,
> + .shutdown = lpfc_pci_remove_one,
> .suspend = lpfc_pci_suspend_one,
> .resume = lpfc_pci_resume_one,
> .err_handler = &lpfc_err_handler,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists