[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <54E1A529.50705@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:07:05 +0100
From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...sung.com>
To: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@...sung.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: udc-core: independent registration of
gadgets and gadget drivers
W dniu 15.02.2015 o 23:43, Ruslan Bilovol pisze:
<snip>
>>
>> In my opinion all things which you have described are working out-of-box
>> when you use configfs interface. It's mostly ready so you may create
>> equivalent of most legacy gadgets (apart from printer and tcm) and
>> just bind from one udc to another whenever you want.
>
> It's because legacy gadgets are easy to use and usually don't need any
> userspace-side configuration. Are there any plans to remove legacy
> drivers in the future?
>
I'm not going to express strong opinions here, but their name implies
that this can happen, some time in the future.
And I also think it will not happen before the userspace part
(libusbg, gt, gadgetd etc) is mature enough. My personal opinion
in that matter is that it will take at least a couple of years
to remove legacy gadgets entirely.
AP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists