[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1424168589.git.osandov@osandov.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 02:51:06 -0800
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: ENOMEM bugfixes
Hi,
As it turns out, running with low memory is a really easy way to shake
out undesirable behavior in Btrfs. This can be especially bad when
considering that a memory limit is really easy to hit in a container
(e.g., by using cgroup memory.limit_in_bytes). Here's a simple script
that can hit several problems:
----
#!/bin/sh
cgcreate -g memory:enomem
MEM=$((64 * 1024 * 1024))
echo $MEM > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/enomem/memory.limit_in_bytes
cgexec -g memory:enomem ~/xfstests/ltp/fsstress -p128 -n999999999 -d /mnt/test &
trap "killall fsstress; exit 0" SIGINT SIGTERM
while true; do
cgexec -g memory:enomem python -c '
l = []
while True:
l.append(0)'
done
----
Ignoring for now the cases that drop the filesystem into read-only mode
with relatively little fuss, here are a few patches that fix some of the
low-hanging fruit. They apply to Linus' tree as of today.
Thanks!
Omar Sandoval (3):
btrfs: handle ENOMEM in btrfs_alloc_tree_block
btrfs: handle race on ENOMEM in alloc_extent_buffer
btrfs: check io_ctl_prepare_pages return in __btrfs_write_out_cache
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 10 ++++++----
3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.3.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists