linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 077/122] net: rps: fix cpu unplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:34:24 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 077/122] net: rps: fix cpu unplug

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

[ Upstream commit ac64da0b83d82abe62f78b3d0e21cca31aea24fa ]

softnet_data.input_pkt_queue is protected by a spinlock that
we must hold when transferring packets from victim queue to an active
one. This is because other cpus could still be trying to enqueue packets
into victim queue.

A second problem is that when we transfert the NAPI poll_list from
victim to current cpu, we absolutely need to special case the percpu
backlog, because we do not want to add complex locking to protect
process_queue : Only owner cpu is allowed to manipulate it, unless cpu
is offline.

Based on initial patch from Prasad Sodagudi & Subash Abhinov
Kasiviswanathan.

This version is better because we do not slow down packet processing,
only make migration safer.

Reported-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>
Reported-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index ece49db4f265..249ab7d67254 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6405,10 +6405,20 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 		oldsd->output_queue = NULL;
 		oldsd->output_queue_tailp = &oldsd->output_queue;
 	}
-	/* Append NAPI poll list from offline CPU. */
-	if (!list_empty(&oldsd->poll_list)) {
-		list_splice_init(&oldsd->poll_list, &sd->poll_list);
-		raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
+	/* Append NAPI poll list from offline CPU, with one exception :
+	 * process_backlog() must be called by cpu owning percpu backlog.
+	 * We properly handle process_queue & input_pkt_queue later.
+	 */
+	while (!list_empty(&oldsd->poll_list)) {
+		struct napi_struct *napi = list_first_entry(&oldsd->poll_list,
+							    struct napi_struct,
+							    poll_list);
+
+		list_del_init(&napi->poll_list);
+		if (napi->poll == process_backlog)
+			napi->state = 0;
+		else
+			____napi_schedule(sd, napi);
 	}
 
 	raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_TX_SOFTIRQ);
@@ -6419,7 +6429,7 @@ static int dev_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 		netif_rx(skb);
 		input_queue_head_incr(oldsd);
 	}
-	while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&oldsd->input_pkt_queue))) {
+	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&oldsd->input_pkt_queue))) {
 		netif_rx(skb);
 		input_queue_head_incr(oldsd);
 	}
-- 
2.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/