[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJe8K0dtLufmLmRU2az=ZX8Wu1JsBS-U=jewRGCQkL8atXr1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:33:47 +0400
From: Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
To: Alexander Drozdov <al.drozdov@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: ip_check_defrag should correctly check return value
of skb_copy_bits
On 2/17/15, Alexander Drozdov <al.drozdov@...il.com> wrote:
> skb_copy_bits() returns zero on success and negative value on error,
> so it is needed to invert the condition in ip_check_defrag().
>
Nice. Grepping through the net directory shows that the skb_copy_bits()
return value is completely ignored in net/wireless/util.c
> Fixes: 1bf3751ec90c ("ipv4: ip_check_defrag must not modify skb before
> unsharing")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Drozdov <al.drozdov@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> index e5b6d0d..2c8d98e 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ struct sk_buff *ip_check_defrag(struct sk_buff *skb, u32
> user)
> if (skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP))
> return skb;
>
> - if (!skb_copy_bits(skb, 0, &iph, sizeof(iph)))
> + if (skb_copy_bits(skb, 0, &iph, sizeof(iph)) < 0)
> return skb;
>
> if (iph.ihl < 5 || iph.version != 4)
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists