[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw2tODqepCea+wWatE+sVeRcsn6cfSzUqSBOhKau2ZB5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:20:20 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@...marydata.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] locks: flock and lease related bugfixes, and remove
i_flctx counters
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I do believe that we should add a "list_count()" function, so that we could write
>
> *flock_count = list_count(&ctx->flc_flock);
>
> instead of that horribly ugly
>
> list_for_each_entry(lock, &ctx->flc_flock, fl_list)
> ++(*flock_count);
>
> thing. But that's a separate cleanup.
The helper function would possibly be something like this.
Untested. It may mix-count, or it might do unspeakable acts on your
pets. No guarantees.
Linus
View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/plain" (1178 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists