[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150218073740.71da0354@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:37:40 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (mips build failures)
Hi Guenter,
[Add Ralf to cc]
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:20:36 -0800 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> Build results:
> total: 121 pass: 109 fail: 12
> Failed builds:
> mips:defconfig
> mips:allmodconfig
> mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
> mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
> mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
> mips:ath79_defconfig
> mips:ar7_defconfig
> mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
> mips:e55_defconfig
> mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
> mips:malta_defconfig
> sparc64:allmodconfig
>
> mips builds are all failing with
>
> Building mips:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> arch/mips/kernel/genex.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/mips/kernel/genex.S:128: Error: Bad value (mips64r6) for internal use
> arch/mips/kernel/genex.S:128: Error: unknown ISA level 64r6
>
> This was introduced by commit 0bf705e94771800 ("MIPS: kernel: genex: Set
> correct ISA level") which apparently assumes that only mips64r6 is a valid
> ISA level, though it is obviously not supported on older compilers. This
> is on top of the other mips r6 related build errors seen yesterday.
>
> I really hope that this is not 3.20 material, given the lack of testing
> with architectures other than mips r6 or with older compilers.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists