[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E45D31.3020302@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:36:49 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@...escale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
agraf@...e.de, pbonzini@...hat.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, scottwood@...escale.com,
mihai.caraman@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/kvm: Limit MAX_VCPUS for guests running on
RT Linux
On 02/18/2015 10:32 AM, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> Due to the introduction of the raw_spinlock for the KVM openpic, guests with a
> high number of VCPUs may induce great latencies on the underlying RT Linux
> system (e.g. cyclictest reports latencies of ~15ms for guests with 24 VCPUs).
> This can be further aggravated by sending a lot of external interrupts to the
> guest.
>
> A malicious app can abuse this scenario, causing a DoS of the host Linux.
> Until the KVM openpic code is refactored to use finer lock granularity, impose
> a limitation on the number of VCPUs a guest can have when running on a
> PREEMPT_RT_FULL system with KVM_MPIC emulation.
How is this possible? You take the raw lock, write a register, release
the raw lock. How can the guest lockup the host? Is this write blocking
in guest?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists