[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E46276.1080205@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:59:18 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: david.vrabel@...rix.com, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 13/13] xen: allow more than 512 GB of RAM
for 64 bit pv-domains
On 02/18/2015 10:49 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.02.15 at 10:37, <JGross@...e.com> wrote:
>> On 02/18/2015 10:21 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 07:52 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -23,14 +23,29 @@ config XEN_PVHVM
>>>> def_bool y
>>>> depends on XEN && PCI && X86_LOCAL_APIC
>>>>
>>>> -config XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY
>>>> - int
>>>> - default 500 if X86_64
>>>> - default 64 if X86_32
>>>> - depends on XEN
>>>> - help
>>>> - This only affects the sizing of some bss arrays, the unused
>>>> - portions of which are freed.
>>>> +if X86_64
>>>
>>> Not
>>> && XEN
>>> ?
>>
>> The complete directory is made only if CONFIG_XEN is set.
>
> But that doesn't mean this file gets used only when XEN is enabled.
Oh, you are right. I seem to have mixed up make and Kconfig of the
directory.
> I would think though that an eventual "if XEN" should have wider
> scope than just this option (i.e. likely almost the entire file).
Indeed.
So either I'll add the XEN dependency for the new option or I do
another patch adding "if XEN" just below configuring XEN and remove
the XEN dependencies in the rest of the entries.
As Luis is just doing a rework of XEN Kconfig stuff, I think I'll add
the XEN dependency.
Juergen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists