[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150218103322.GA16432@kwain>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:33:22 +0100
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
jszhang@...vell.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] ARM: berlin: rework chip and system controller
nodes for BG2
Hi Sebastian!
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:29:50AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 11.02.2015 17:15, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> [...]
> >- chip: chip-control@...000 {
> >- compatible = "marvell,berlin2-chip-ctrl";
> >- #clock-cells = <1>;
> >- #reset-cells = <2>;
> >+ chip: chip-controller@...000 {
> >+ compatible = "marvell,berlin2-chip-ctrl", "syscon";
> > reg = <0xea0000 0x400>;
> >+ #clock-cells = <1>;
>
> I noticed just now, but we should either have all of clock, reset,
> pinctrl as sub-nodes or none. Currently, this has pinctrl and reset
> as sub-nodes but clock hooked up to chip-controller.
Of course. The clock rework is part of the other series[1] which
modifies the clock driver to use regmap but also move the clock into
its own sub-node.
Antoine
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/13/252
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists