[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E46B0B.4010703@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:35:55 +0100
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
CC: jszhang@...vell.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] ARM: berlin: rework chip and system controller
nodes for BG2
On 18.02.2015 11:33, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:29:50AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>> On 11.02.2015 17:15, Antoine Tenart wrote:
>> [...]
>>> - chip: chip-control@...000 {
>>> - compatible = "marvell,berlin2-chip-ctrl";
>>> - #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> - #reset-cells = <2>;
>>> + chip: chip-controller@...000 {
>>> + compatible = "marvell,berlin2-chip-ctrl", "syscon";
>>> reg = <0xea0000 0x400>;
>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>
>> I noticed just now, but we should either have all of clock, reset,
>> pinctrl as sub-nodes or none. Currently, this has pinctrl and reset
>> as sub-nodes but clock hooked up to chip-controller.
>
> Of course. The clock rework is part of the other series[1] which
> modifies the clock driver to use regmap but also move the clock into
> its own sub-node.
Ah, ok. I misinterpreted the addition of #clock-cells above, but it
gets removed and re-added again.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists