[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E46E61.8030805@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:50:09 +0000
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/13] xen: anchor linear p2m list in shared
info structure
On 18/02/15 10:42, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
>>> /* Set up p2m_top to point to the domain-builder provided p2m
>>> pages */
>>> @@ -469,8 +473,10 @@ static pte_t *alloc_p2m_pmd(unsigned long addr,
>>> pte_t *pte_pg)
>>>
>>> ptechk = lookup_address(vaddr, &level);
>>> if (ptechk == pte_pg) {
>>> + HYPERVISOR_shared_info->arch.p2m_generation++;
>>> set_pmd(pmdp,
>>> __pmd(__pa(pte_newpg[i]) | _KERNPG_TABLE));
>>> + HYPERVISOR_shared_info->arch.p2m_generation++;
>>
>> Do these increments of p2m_generation need to be atomic?
>
> Hmm, they are done under lock. I don't think the compiler is allowed to
> reorder the writes to p2m_generation across set_pmd().
They do need smp_wmb() to guarantee that the increment is visible before
the update occurs, just as the toolstack will need smp_rmb() to read.
They also need to be protected from concurrent update inside the kernel,
for which a lock should appear to suffice.
~Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists