[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150218130614.GT5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:06:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 32/35] clockevents: Fix cpu down race for hrtimer based
broadcasting
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:40:52AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>
> Look at the changelog,
Heh, yah, clearly I tl;dr'd that. Indeed.
> it explains why tick_takeover must be called
> *before* __cpu_die().
Since you reported this, can you test if things work if you move that
function call to before __cpu_die() ?
I _think_ it should be fine, but what do I know ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists