[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150218153918.GB3485@kryptos>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:39:18 -0600
From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@....teric.us>
To: Gilad Avidov <gavidov@...eaurora.org>
Cc: sdharia@...eaurora.org, mlocke@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iivanov@...sol.com,
galak@...eaurora.org, agross@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 03:51:11PM -0700, Gilad Avidov wrote:
> According to spmi spec a slave powers up into startup state and then
> transitions into active state. Thus, the wakeup command is not required
> before calling the slave's probe. The wakeup command is only needed for
> slaves that are in sleep state after receiving the sleep command.
>
> This is a bug since spmi master controllers, such as spmi-pmic-arb,
> which have no support for wakeup command return an error on that
> command and thus fail before reaching a slave driver probe.
If masters are required by the spec to support all commands as Stephen
mentions, then I'd argue this is not a bug in the core code at all, but
in the spmi-pmic-arb driver. But, unfortunately, having lost access to
the spec, I'll defer.
Regardless, I think this is useful as an optimization, just with dubious
justification.
Therefore,
Acked-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@....teric.us>
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists