[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-8d1e5a1a1ccf5ae9d8a5a0ee7960202ccb0c5429@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:05:15 -0800
From: tip-bot for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/rtmutex:
Avoid a NULL pointer dereference on deadlock
Commit-ID: 8d1e5a1a1ccf5ae9d8a5a0ee7960202ccb0c5429
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8d1e5a1a1ccf5ae9d8a5a0ee7960202ccb0c5429
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:43:43 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:20:32 +0100
locking/rtmutex: Avoid a NULL pointer dereference on deadlock
With task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() returning early -EDEADLK we never
add the waiter to the waitqueue. Later, we try to remove it via
remove_waiter() and go boom in rt_mutex_top_waiter() because
rb_entry() gives a NULL pointer.
( Tested on v3.18-RT where rtmutex is used for regular mutex and I
tried to get one twice in a row. )
Not sure when this started but I guess 397335f004f4 ("rtmutex: Fix
deadlock detector for real") or commit 3d5c9340d194 ("rtmutex:
Handle deadlock detection smarter").
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # for v3.16 and later kernels
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424187823-19600-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 3059bc2f..e16e554 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1193,7 +1193,8 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
- remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
+ if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
+ remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists