[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-49e4b2bcf7b812e985e65b6c8a0255b1520a6e7e@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:11:38 -0800
From: tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, jason.low2@...com, hpa@...or.com,
walken@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dbueso@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, dave@...olabs.net
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem:
Document barrier need when waking tasks
Commit-ID: 49e4b2bcf7b812e985e65b6c8a0255b1520a6e7e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/49e4b2bcf7b812e985e65b6c8a0255b1520a6e7e
Author: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
AuthorDate: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:14:24 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:57:10 +0100
locking/rwsem: Document barrier need when waking tasks
The need for the smp_mb() in __rwsem_do_wake() should be
properly documented. Applies to both xadd and spinlock
variants.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422609267-15102-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 7 +++++++
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
index 2555ae1..3a50485 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
@@ -85,6 +85,13 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
list_del(&waiter->list);
tsk = waiter->task;
+ /*
+ * Make sure we do not wakeup the next reader before
+ * setting the nil condition to grant the next reader;
+ * otherwise we could miss the wakeup on the other
+ * side and end up sleeping again. See the pairing
+ * in rwsem_down_read_failed().
+ */
smp_mb();
waiter->task = NULL;
wake_up_process(tsk);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 2f7cc40..82aba46 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -186,6 +186,13 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
waiter = list_entry(next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
next = waiter->list.next;
tsk = waiter->task;
+ /*
+ * Make sure we do not wakeup the next reader before
+ * setting the nil condition to grant the next reader;
+ * otherwise we could miss the wakeup on the other
+ * side and end up sleeping again. See the pairing
+ * in rwsem_down_read_failed().
+ */
smp_mb();
waiter->task = NULL;
wake_up_process(tsk);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists