[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E4ECFD.6070401@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:50:21 +0100
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] kernel/fork.c: avoid division by zero
On 18.02.2015 20:38, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 03:15:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:01:38 +0100 Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de> wrote:
>>
>>> PAGE_SIZE is not guaranteed to be equal to or less than 8 times the
>>> THREAD_SIZE.
>>>
>>> E.g. architecture hexagon may have page size 1M and thread size 4096.
>>>
>>> This would lead to a division by zero.
>>>
>>> The futex implementation assumes that tids fit into the FUTEX_TID_MASK.
>>> This limits the number of allowable threads.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> --- a/kernel/fork.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
>>> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/uprobes.h>
>>> #include <linux/aio.h>
>>> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>>> +#include <linux/math64.h>
>>>
>>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>>> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>>> @@ -255,6 +256,8 @@ void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { }
>>>
>>> void __init fork_init(unsigned long mempages)
>>> {
>>> + u64 temp;
>>
>> That's a really poor name. We should always try to make names
>> meaningful. Here, something like "threads" would be better.
>>
>>> #ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_TASK_STRUCT_ALLOCATOR
>>> #ifndef ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN
>>> #define ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
>>> @@ -273,7 +276,16 @@ void __init fork_init(unsigned long mempages)
>>> * value: the thread structures can take up at most half
>>> * of memory.
>>> */
>>> - max_threads = mempages / (8 * THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE);
>>> + temp = div64_u64((u64) mempages * (u64) PAGE_SIZE,
>>> + (u64) THREAD_SIZE * 8UL);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * The futex code assumes that tids fit into the FUTEX_TID_MASK.
>>> + */
>>> + if (temp < FUTEX_TID_MASK)
>>> + max_threads = temp;
>>> + else
>>> + max_threads = FUTEX_TID_MASK;
>>
>> Seems rather complicated. How about
>>
>> max_threads = mempages / (8 * THREAD_SIZE);
>
> Apparently it is possible that
> mempages < 8 * THREAD_SIZE
> which would result in max_threads == 0.
>
> How about the following ?
>
> max_threads = mempages / DIV_ROUND_UP(8 * THREAD_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
For PAGE_SIZE 2MB and THREAD_SIZE 4kB this is wrong by factor 64.
Best regards
Heinrich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists