[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150218045745.GD3222@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:57:45 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@....ibm.com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] drivers/core/of: Add symlink to device-tree from
devices with an OF node
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:25:18AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> So I've been annoyed lately with having a bunch of devices such as i2c
> eeproms (for use by VPDs, server world !) and other bits and pieces that
> I want to be able to identify from userspace, and possibly provide
> additional data about from FW.
>
> Basically, it boils down to correlating the sysfs device with the OF
> tree device node, so that user space can use device-tree info such as
> additional "location" or "label" (or whatever else we can come up with)
> propreties to identify a given device, or get some attributes of use
> about it, etc...
>
> Now, so far, we've done that in some subsystem in a fairly ad-hoc basis
> using "devspec" properties. For example, PCI creates them if it can
> correlate the probed device with a DT node. Some powerpc specific busses
> do that too.
>
> However, i2c doesn't and it would be nice to have something more generic
> since technically any device can have a corresponding device tree node.
>
> This patch adds an "of_node" symlink to devices that have a non-NULL
> dev->of_node pointer, the patch is pretty trivial and seems to work just
> fine for me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> This addresses Greg's comments. Note that I'm not 100% certain about
> using device_add_class_symlinks(), I had to put the code before the
> test for dev->class, maybe we should rename that function to device_add_symlinks()
> if it grows beyond the class bits ?
That would probably be a good idea, but we can leave it for now.
> Also there was nothing that I could find in Documentation/ABI that
> documented "core" device properties, it's all in
> Documentation/sysfs-rules.txt, but as suggested by Greg (on IRC) I
> went for ABI anyway, so I've added a file for "generic" properties
> and added that one in. I'm happy to change it if you think that's not
> right, just let me know where you want things.
It looks good as-is, thanks.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists