[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1424305990-17983-9-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:31:35 -0800
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 008/103] parisc: fix out-of-register compiler error in ldcw inline assembler function
3.13.11-ckt16 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
commit 45db07382a5c78b0c43b3b0002b63757fb60e873 upstream.
The __ldcw macro has a problem when its argument needs to be reloaded from
memory. The output memory operand and the input register operand both need to
be reloaded using a register in class R1_REGS when generating 64-bit code.
This fails because there's only a single register in the class. Instead, use a
memory clobber. This also makes the __ldcw macro a compiler memory barrier.
Signed-off-by: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h
index d2d11b7..8121aa6 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h
+++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/ldcw.h
@@ -33,11 +33,18 @@
#endif /*!CONFIG_PA20*/
-/* LDCW, the only atomic read-write operation PA-RISC has. *sigh*. */
+/* LDCW, the only atomic read-write operation PA-RISC has. *sigh*.
+ We don't explicitly expose that "*a" may be written as reload
+ fails to find a register in class R1_REGS when "a" needs to be
+ reloaded when generating 64-bit PIC code. Instead, we clobber
+ memory to indicate to the compiler that the assembly code reads
+ or writes to items other than those listed in the input and output
+ operands. This may pessimize the code somewhat but __ldcw is
+ usually used within code blocks surrounded by memory barriors. */
#define __ldcw(a) ({ \
unsigned __ret; \
- __asm__ __volatile__(__LDCW " 0(%2),%0" \
- : "=r" (__ret), "+m" (*(a)) : "r" (a)); \
+ __asm__ __volatile__(__LDCW " 0(%1),%0" \
+ : "=r" (__ret) : "r" (a) : "memory"); \
__ret; \
})
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists