[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150219103346.GE3198@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:33:46 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/2] regulator: da9210: Add optional interrupt support
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 03:18:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:11:12PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> - Does there exist any regulator notifier event that corresponds to
> >> DA9210_E_VMAX?
> > What does that mean, I might be able to tell you? I guess it might be
> > an over voltage event...
> Possibly. There's no regulator notifier event for that yet, though.
> Shall I add one?
I'm wondering if it may be better to change the first notification to
just a general "out of regulation" one, though the consequences of over
voltage are usually different to under voltage if that is what's going
on here.
> Anyway, let's wait for confirmation from Dialog...
I guess - is there really no indication in the datasheet?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists