linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Revert disabling of smc91x for n900

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201502191159.57981@pali>
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:59:57 +0100
From:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Revert disabling of smc91x for n900

On Thursday 19 February 2015 05:50:48 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> [150218 15:58]:
> > On Wednesday 18 February 2015 23:42:06 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Of course it's always possible to do do a
> > > omap3-n900-qemu.dts if larger changes are needed :)
> > 
> > I would like to avoid using separate DTS for qemu. When we
> > have only one DTS file (for both qemu and real HW), we can
> > test for regression in qemu and we are sure that we have
> > same software configuration...
> 
> Agreed, and I'd rather take the extra warning on rare to find
> hardware to avoid an etra .dts file.
> 
> Are there any reasons whey the n900 qemu support could not
> be in the mainline qemu btw?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony

Missing lot of omap stuff (in mainline qemu) which linaro have 
not sent to mainline yet...

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)