lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1424357415.4942.118.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:50:15 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Drozdov <al.drozdov@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	ideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ipv4: ip_check_defrag should correctly check
 return value of skb_copy_bits

On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 12:26 +0300, Alexander Drozdov wrote:
> skb_copy_bits() returns zero on success and a negative value on error,
> so it is needed to invert the condition in ip_check_defrag().
> 
> Fixes: 1bf3751ec90c ("ipv4: ip_check_defrag must not modify skb before unsharing")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Drozdov <al.drozdov@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 2 +-

No need to resend, your first patch is still active in patchwork.
David is probably traveling from Ottawa.

vi +100  Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt

Q: I sent a patch and I'm wondering what happened to it.  How can I tell
   whether it got merged?

A: Start by looking at the main patchworks queue for netdev:

        http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/

   The "State" field will tell you exactly where things are at with
   your patch.

Q: The above only says "Under Review".  How can I find out more?

A: Generally speaking, the patches get triaged quickly (in less than 48h).
   So be patient.  Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
   patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to
   the bottom of the priority list.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ