[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150219150723.GF21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:07:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, mst@...hat.com,
David.Laight@...LAB.COM, hughd@...gle.com, hocko@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Reenable might_sleep() checks for might_fault()
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:48:05PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Downside is that now that I have to touch all fault handlers, I have to go
> through all archs again.
You should be able to borrow from the -rt patches there. They have all
that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists