[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150219161604.GB17717@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:16:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Rafael David Tinoco <inaddy@...ntu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Gema Gomez <gema.gomez-solano@...onical.com>,
chris.j.arges@...onical.com
Subject: Re: smp_call_function_single lockups
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:42:39PM -0200, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> Linus, Peter, Thomas
>
> Just a quick feedback, We were able to reproduce the lockup with this
> proposed patch (3.19 + patch). Unfortunately we had problems with the
> core file and I have only the stack trace for now but I think we are
> able to reproduce it again and provide more details (sorry for the
> delay... after a reboot it took some days for us to reproduce this
> again).
>
> It looks like RIP is still smp_call_function_single.
So Linus' patch mostly fixes smp_call_function_single_async() which is
not what you're using.
It would be very good to see traces of other CPUs; if for some reason
the target CPU doesn't get around to running your callback, then we'll
forever wait on it.
loaded_vmcs_clear() uses smp_call_function_single(.wait = 1), that
should work as before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists