linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:03:53 -0600
From:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_task_call()

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:33:59PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:24:29AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> > > No, these tasks will _never_ make syscalls. So you need to guarantee
> > > they don't accidentally enter the kernel while you flip them. Something
> > > like so should do.
> > > 
> > > You set TIF_ENTER_WAIT on them, check they're still in userspace, flip
> > > them then clear TIF_ENTER_WAIT.
> > 
> > Ah, that's a good idea.  But how do we check if they're in user space?
> 
> I don't see the benefit in holding them in a loop - you can just as well
> flip them from the syscall code as kGraft does.

But we were talking specifically about HPC tasks which never make
syscalls.

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/