lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:36:00 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
	Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm: am33xx: DT quirks for am33xx based beaglebone
 variants

* Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com> [150219 10:32]:
> > On Feb 19, 2015, at 20:16 , Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Uhh I don't like the idea of duplicating the i2c-omap.c driver under
> > arch/arm.. And in general we should initialize things later rather
> > than earlier.
> > 
> > What's stopping doing these quirk checks later on time with just
> > a regular device driver, something like drivers/misc/bbone-quirks.c?
> > 
> 
> We have no choice; we are way early in the boot process, right after
> the device tree unflattening step.

To me it seems the dt patching part should be done with minimal
code before any driver like features..
 
> I’ve toyed with the idea of using early platform devices but the omap-i2c driver
> would need some tender love and care to make it work, and I didn’t want to get
> bogged down with i2c driver details at this point.

..so how about just parse a kernel cmdline for the quirks to apply
based on a version string or similar? That can be easily populated
by u-boot or set manually with setenv.

That leaves out the need for tinkering with i2c super early in
the kernel for revision detection.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ