linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] doc: brief user documentation for completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:04:49 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] doc: brief user documentation for completion


* Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:29:33 +0100
> > Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at> wrote:
> > 
> > > thanks for the detailed review notes
> > > 
> > > will give it another run regarding locking and context - I obviously need a 
> > > rerun regarding context and locking my self.
> > 
> > Note that the document went upstream last week, so it would be best to
> > get changes as a patch against that version.
>
> for review I do think it would be best to send it out as 
> a full text - once the content is acked no issue with 
> sending it out as a patch to the current version.

That would be fine to me. You could do both: send the full 
text, attach the diff at the end.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/