[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150219191321.GA12008@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:13:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf/x86: Add ability to sample TSC
* Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> > I suspect you're talking about something else entirely;
> > your changelogs are inadequate for they tell ntohing of
> > your usecase and have me guessing. Don't do that.
>
> Sorry. I did mention Intel PT in patch 2, but I basically
> assumed the need to synchronize events with other time
> sources was understood.
Written down, slightly repetitive walk-throughs from first
concepts to implementation that don't assume too much
context are very useful to us slightly overworked
maintainers with an attention span of a slightly retarded
golden retriever. (Make the story interesting and mix in a
few jokes and you've got our attention for sure!)
So please do explain verbosely, especially if a review
discussion turns somewhat discordant, it's a useful tool.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists