linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a modern way"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87egpl8w5q.fsf@free.fr>
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:48:49 +0100
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, nico@...xnic.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a modern way"

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

>> Now if you can make it in -rc2 or -rc3, this revert should be forgotten. But if
>> you can't make it for 3.20, I'll push for the revert.
>> 
>> So I think it's up to you now, and let's see what Gregh says about it.
>
> What is the current status of this?  I'd like to see this move forward so we
> can get this fixed ASAP.
Hi David,

Linus has submitted the patch [1]. I'll be watching carefully until -rc4 that
this is applied. If it's not, I'll reping you to apply this revert. Until then,
you can forget about it, I'll do the follow-up.

Does that plan sound good to you ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/18/310
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/