[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1502192223070.28769@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:26:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_task_call()
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> How about with a TIF_IN_USERSPACE thread flag? It could be cleared/set
> right at the border. Then for running tasks it's as simple as:
>
> if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_IN_USERSPACE))
> klp_switch_task_universe(task);
That's in principle what CONTEXT_TRACKING is doing, i.e. the condition
we'd be interested in would be
__this_cpu_read(context_tracking.state) == IN_USER
But it has overhead.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists