linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 078/103] gpio: fix sleep-while-atomic in gpiochip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1424305990-17983-79-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:32:45 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 078/103] gpio: fix sleep-while-atomic in gpiochip_remove

3.13.11-ckt16 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

commit 6798acaa0138d8b12f1c54402ebcb66fea3deb03 upstream.

Move direct and indirect calls to gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges outside of
spin lock as they can end up taking a mutex in pinctrl_remove_gpio_range.

Note that the pin ranges are already added outside of the lock.

Fixes: 9ef0d6f7628b ("gpiolib: call pin removal in chip removal function")
Fixes: f23f1516b675 ("gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges")
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 3ef348f..f86386c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1256,12 +1256,11 @@ int gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 	int		status = 0;
 	unsigned	id;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
-
 	gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip);
 	of_gpiochip_remove(chip);
 	acpi_gpiochip_remove(chip);
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	for (id = 0; id < chip->ngpio; id++) {
 		if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &chip->desc[id].flags)) {
 			status = -EBUSY;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/