[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220092150.GD22059@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:21:51 +0000
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"efault@....de" <efault@....de>,
"nicolas.pitre@...aro.org" <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v9 04/10] sched: Make sched entity usage tracking
scale-invariant
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:05:28PM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:02:36PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > > There is no actual function definition in this patch; this would hinder
> > > linking, no?
> >
> > The function definition already lives further down in fair.c. I can move
> > it up here if you prefer?
>
> argh.. ok.
>
> With previous patches removing all that I had missed you ;eft this one.
>
> I thought everything got ripped and we went with new stuff.
I see. Vincent's patch only removes the old calls to the function, not
the function itself. The history might get more clear if we wipe it
completely before reintroducing again with a slightly different meaning.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists