[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220073716.64560682@recife.lan>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:37:16 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>,
Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@...e.fr>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] [kbuild] Add and use IS_REACHABLE macro
Em Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:29:42 +0100
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> escreveu:
> On Thursday 19 February 2015 16:06:18 Michal Marek wrote:
> > > We have similar problems in other areas
> > > of the kernel. In theory, we could enforce the VIDEO_TUNER driver to
> > > be modular here by adding lots of dependencies to it:
> > >
> > > config VIDEO_TUNER
> > > tristate
> > > depends on MEDIA_TUNER_TEA5761 || !MEDIA_TUNER_TEA5761
> > > depends on MEDIA_TUNER_TEA5767 || !MEDIA_TUNER_TEA5767
> > > depends on MEDIA_TUNER_MSI001 || !MEDIA_TUNER_MSI001
> >
> > Nah, that's even uglier. I suggest to merge your IS_REACHABLE patch.
> >
>
> Ok, can I take this as an ack from your side to merge the
> include/linux/kconfig.h part of the patch through the linux-media
> tree?
>
> I thought about splitting up the patch into two, but that would
> just make merging it harder because we'd still have the dependency.
It is likely better if I merge at the linux-media tree. This way,
we can avoid conflicts with those headers, if this is ok for
Marek.
Regards,
Mauro
>
> Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists