linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clockevents: Add (missing) default case for switch blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150220114136.GA27483@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:41:36 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linaro-networking@...aro.org, Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents: Add (missing) default case for switch blocks


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > > But it does mean we need to be able to add values to 
> > > the enum.
> > 
> > So I'm confused: if we are using proper callbacks (like 
> > my example outlined) , why is a 'mode enum' needed at 
> > all?
> 
> Ah, its because the enum is shared between two different 
> use-cases. The one is the clockevent driver for the 
> clock_event_device::set_mode() call, and one is the 
> clockevent core call: clockevent_set_mode().
> 
> The previous patch changed the driver interface, but 
> retained the sharing of the enum across both interfaces.
> 
> Maybe we should break that enum into two; one for devices 
> and one for the core interface and avoid the problem that 
> way.

Yeah, that would do the trick.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/